The Relationship Between Preoperative Alvarado Score and Postoperative Anatomical Pathology Results In Acute Appendicitis at Royal Prima Marelan General Hospital In 2024

Authors

  • Imelda Anjayani Faculty of Medicine, Prima Indonesia University, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Arafat Muchtar Faculty of Medicine, Prima Indonesia University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijhp.v5i4.458

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency characterized by inflammation of the appendix, requiring timely diagnosis to prevent complications. The Alvarado score is a simple, inexpensive clinical tool designed to aid early diagnosis, while histopathological examination remains the diagnostic gold standard. This study explores the relationship between preoperative Alvarado scores and postoperative anatomical pathology results at Royal Prima Marelan Hospital in 2024. Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study analyzed medical records of 89 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis who underwent appendectomy from January to December 2024. Data on demographic characteristics, Alvarado scores, and histopathological outcomes were extracted. Chi-square tests assessed correlation, while sensitivity and specificity analyzes evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado score. Results: Most patients were aged 15–24 years (55.1%) and female (56.2%). Alvarado scores ≥7 were observed in 85.4% of cases. Histopathology confirmed acute appendicitis in 95.5% of patients and chronic inflammation in 4.5%. A significant association was found between Alvarado scores and pathology results (p=0.000; OR=24.485). The Alvarado score demonstrated high predictive value for acute appendicitis. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between preoperative Alvarado scores and postoperative pathological findings in acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is a practical tool to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary surgeries. Future research should validate these findings with larger, prospective studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiati-Fkik. (nd). Relationship between Alvarado score and pathological anatomy in patients with acute appendicitis. [Unpublished manuscript].

Al-Tarakji, M., Al-Saadi, J., Ameen, A., & Alhzami, A. (2022). The role of Alvarado score in predicting acute appendicitis and its severity in correlation to histopathology: A retrospective study in a Qatar population. Cureus, 14(7), e101323.https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.101323

Capili, B. (2021). Overview: Cross-sectional studies. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 36(5), 375–379.https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000827

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Elfil, M., & Negida, A. (2017). Sampling methods in clinical research: An educational review. Emergency Medicine International, 2017, 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9265071

Febyan, R. (2020). Anatomy and pathology of the appendix. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, 8(2),123-130.

Nugrohowati, N., Widianto, A., Itsnaini, ZZ, Mahardhika, SUI, & Sulistyani, R. (2022). The correlation between Alvarado score and histopathological profile of appendicitis in Academic Hospital of Universitas Gadjah Mada. Academic Hospital Publications.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.020

Rebekah Febrianti Zebua, et al. (2022). Epidemiology of acute appendicitis in North Sumatra: Prevalence and clinical implications. Indonesian Journal of Surgery, 15(1), 45-52.

Roopmala, M., Santhosh, J., & Kumar, A.S. (2019). Histopathological evaluation of appendectomy specimens and its clinical correlation. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(4), 1201–1205.https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191400

Siregar, D., et al. (2023a). Clinical approach and challenges to acute appendicitis diagnosis. International Journal of Clinical Surgery, 11(3), 55–60.

Sudaryono, A. (2022). Research methods for writing undergraduate theses, dissertations, and dissertations (4th ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono, D. (2021). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods (13th ed.). Alfabeta.

Wang, X. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Medical Science Monitor, 26, e925301.https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925301.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16